If the contract has expired, it may expire (for example. B on a given date) or has been terminated (z.B by one or both parties according to the criteria set out in the agreement). In fact, if you are talking about the event (i.e. the agreement) according to the state, there should have been a verb in the past to create a correct sentence (for example. B a contract has been concluded). But the wording quoted (without verb) would be normal at the end of the agreement itself, especially directly above the signatures of the contracting parties: this is where the current tension applies, because they actually conclude the agreement by adding their signatures. Close (FINISH): to conclude a formal agreement or task, or to arrange a business contract Cambridge Dictionary Ecclestone said he was “happy” that the new agreement had been reached. More than half of these agreements were concluded before 2013. Formally conclude a “ceasefire attempt” and finally agree (an agreement) “Negotiations for a new agreement have failed.” Oxford Dictionary It is considered that the wording of Article 72, paragraph 2 of the Civil Code limits compensation to negative contractual interests.
Under this provision, a fair negotiator must “repair the harm suffered by the other party by relying on the conclusion of the contract” and not the harm caused by the non-convention. Therefore, in determining the amount of the damage suffered, in accordance with Article 72, paragraph 2, of the BGB, it is necessary to compare the circumstances that would have existed if the negotiations had not been unfaithful, to compare with those that followed the event. However, the question of whether this prejudice extends to the shortfall is controversial. In a statement from the House of Commons, Alexander said the Heads of Agreement negotiations on pension plans had been concluded by a “guaranteed commitment to most unions to suspend further union action,” while final details were finalized and unions consulted with their members. In accordance with Article 72, paragraph 1, of the BGB, the contract is concluded when two parties enter into a contract as soon as the parties have agreed on the provisions under discussion. Therefore, Polish law does not allow us to argue that a contract has been concluded if the parties have only reached an agreement on some of the contractual provisions to be negotiated, even if they are part of the essential conditions (Article 154, paragraph 1, of the BGB). However, other jurisdictions treat this issue differently (for example. B art. 1583 of the Belgian Civil Code). Questions of liability in the event of an error in the conclusion of the contract are excluded from the scope of the Rome I regulation.
Article 1, paragraph 2, paragraph (i) excludes from the scope of the regulation the obligations arising from the negotiations prior to the conclusion of the contract. These issues are in fact governed by Article 12 of the Rome II Regulation (864/2007), which states that the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, which arises before the contract was concluded, whether it was concluded or concluded, applies to the contract or the law that would have been applicable at the time the contract was concluded.